Beyond the Backlog

I’ve often found myself at the crossroads of crucial decisions that can make or break a product’s success. In product development, the ability to make quick, informed decisions is not only a skill – it’s a necessity. That’s why today I want to share with you an approach that has added significantly value to my decision-making process: the RAPID Decision-Making Framework.

---

---

What is the RAPID Decision-Making Framework?

RAPID is an acronym that stands for Recommend, Agree, Perform, Input, and Decide. It’s a framework developed by Bain & Company to streamline decision-making processes in organizations. As a product manager, I’ve found this framework invaluable in clarifying roles, responsibilities, and expectations during critical decision points in the product lifecycle.

Let’s break down each component of RAPID:

1. Recommend: The person or group responsible for making a proposal or recommendation.
2. Agree: Those who need to agree with or approve the recommendation.
3. Perform: The individuals or teams responsible for implementing the decision.
4. Input: People consulted for their opinions or expertise during the decision-making process.
5. Decide: The final decision-maker who has the authority to commit the organization to action.

Why RAPID Matters in Product Management

Over the years, I’ve seen how unclear decision-making processes can lead to delays, conflicts, and missed opportunities. The RAPID framework addresses these issues head-on by providing a clear structure for who does what in the decision-making process.

Here’s why I believe RAPID is crucial for product managers:

1. Clarity of Roles: It eliminates confusion about who’s responsible for each part of the decision-making process.
2. Faster Decisions: By clearly defining roles, it reduces bottlenecks and accelerates the decision-making process.
3. Improved Accountability: Each person knows their role and can be held accountable for their part in the process.
4. Better Collaboration: It encourages input from various stakeholders while maintaining a clear decision-making structure.
5. Reduced Conflict: Clear roles and responsibilities help minimize disagreements and power struggles.

Implementing the RAPID Decision-Making Framework in Your Product Management Process

Now that we understand the basics of RAPID, let’s dive into how you can implement this framework in your product management process. I’ll share some strategies I’ve used successfully in my own work.

Step 1: Identify Key Decision Points

The first step in implementing RAPID is to identify the key decision points in your product development process. These might include:

• Prioritizing features for the product roadmap
• Deciding on the go-to-market strategy
• Choosing between different design concepts
• Determining pricing strategy
• Selecting technology stack for development

For each of these decision points, you’ll apply the RAPID framework.

Step 2: Assign RAPID Roles

Once you’ve identified your key decision points, it’s time to assign RAPID roles. Here’s how I typically approach this:

1. Recommend: This is often the product manager (you!) or a subject matter expert. For technical decisions, it might be the lead developer or architect.
2. Agree: This usually includes key stakeholders like the engineering lead, design lead, or marketing director, depending on the decision at hand.
3. Perform: This is typically the team responsible for implementing the decision, such as the development team, design team, or marketing team.
4. Input: This can include a wide range of people, from customer support representatives who have insights into user needs, to data analysts who can provide relevant metrics.
5. Decide: In many cases, this might be you as the product manager, but for major decisions, it could be a C-level executive or a steering committee.

Remember, these roles can shift depending on the specific decision being made. The key is to be clear about who’s playing which role for each decision.

Step 3: Communicate the RAPID Structure

Once you’ve assigned roles, it’s crucial to communicate this structure to everyone involved. I’ve found that creating a simple RAPID matrix for each key decision point and sharing it with the team can be incredibly helpful.

Here’s an example of what this might look like for a feature prioritization decision:

Step 4: Follow the RAPID Process

With roles assigned and communicated, it’s time to put RAPID into action. Here’s how I typically guide the process:

1. As the Recommender, I prepare a detailed proposal, backed by data and aligned with our product strategy.
2. I consult with the Input providers, gathering insights and feedback to refine the proposal.
3. I present the proposal to those in the Agree role, addressing their concerns and incorporating their feedback.
4. Once we have agreement, I take the proposal to the Decider for final approval.
5. After the decision is made, I communicate it to the Performers and work with them on implementation plans.

Step 5: Review and Iterate

Like any process, RAPID needs regular review and refinement. After each major decision, I like to hold a quick retrospective to discuss what worked well and what could be improved in our RAPID process.

RAPID in Action: A Real-World Example

Let’s take a look at a real-world example of how I’ve used RAPID in my product management work. At NWEA, we were deciding on the feature set for a major product update to the MAP Growth educational assessment. Here’s how we applied RAPID:

Recommend: As the product manager, I prepared a proposal for the feature set based on user feedback, market analysis, and our product strategy.

Agree: I presented the proposal to our engineering lead and design lead. The engineering lead raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing all proposed features within our timeline. We worked together to adjust the scope to something more realistic.

Perform: Our development and design teams were identified as the performers. We involved them early in discussions about implementation challenges and opportunities.

Input: We consulted our customer support team for insights on user pain points, and our data analytics team provided usage statistics on existing features. This input helped us refine our feature priorities.

Decide: Our Product VP made the final decision on the feature set, taking into account all the input and recommendations.

This process allowed us to make a complex decision efficiently, with clear roles and responsibilities throughout. The result was a well-considered feature set that balanced user needs, technical feasibility, and strategic goals.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

While RAPID can significantly improve decision-making, there are some common pitfalls to watch out for. Here are a few I’ve encountered and how I’ve learned to address them:

1. Too Many Agreers: Having too many people in the Agree role can slow down the process. I try to limit this to 2-3 key stakeholders whose agreement is truly necessary.
2. Unclear Decision Criteria: Sometimes, the Decider may not have clear criteria for making the final decision. I always try to establish and communicate these criteria upfront.
3. Bypassing the Process: There can be a temptation to bypass the process for the sake of speed. I’ve learned that this usually leads to problems down the line, so I always advocate for following the RAPID structure, even if it takes a bit more time upfront.
4. Neglecting Input Providers: It’s easy to overlook the importance of Input providers. I make a conscious effort to engage them early and often in the process.
5. Forgetting the Performers: Sometimes, in the rush to make a decision, we forget about the people who will implement it. I always try to involve the Performers in discussions about feasibility and implementation challenges.

---

Subscribe and never miss another post!

---

Adapting RAPID for Different Team Sizes and Structures

One of the great things about RAPID is its flexibility. I’ve used it successfully in both small startups and large enterprises, adapting it to fit different team sizes and structures.

In smaller teams, one person might play multiple roles. For instance, as a product manager in a startup, I’ve often been the Recommender, Agreer, and Decider for many decisions. The key is to still go through the mental process of considering each role separately.

In larger organizations, each role might be filled by a team rather than an individual. For example, the Agree role might be a committee of stakeholders from different departments.

The principles remain the same regardless of team size: clarity of roles, efficient decision-making, and appropriate involvement of stakeholders.

Integrating RAPID with Agile Methodologies

As an advocate of Agile methodologies, I’ve found that RAPID integrates well with Agile processes. Here’s how I typically align RAPID with Agile:

• Sprint Planning: Use RAPID to make decisions about sprint goals and which backlog items to include.
• Daily Stand-ups: Identify any decisions that need to be made and who needs to be involved (RAPID roles).
• Sprint Reviews: Use the RAPID framework to make decisions about product changes based on stakeholder feedback.
• Retrospectives: Review how well the RAPID process worked during the sprint and identify areas for improvement.

By integrating RAPID with Agile, we maintain Agile’s flexibility and responsiveness while adding a structured approach to decision-making.

Measuring the Impact of the RAPID Decision-Making Framework

As with any framework or process, it’s important to measure its impact. Here are some metrics I use to evaluate the effectiveness of RAPID in my product management process:

1. Decision Speed: How long does it take to make key decisions? This should decrease as RAPID becomes embedded in your processes.
2. Decision Quality: Are the decisions made leading to better outcomes? This can be measured through product success metrics, user satisfaction scores, etc.
3. Team Satisfaction: Do team members feel the decision-making process is clear and fair? This can be assessed through team surveys or discussions in retrospectives.
4. Implementation Efficiency: How smoothly are decisions being implemented? This can be measured through project timelines and the number of roadblocks encountered during implementation.
5. Stakeholder Alignment: Are stakeholders aligned on decisions? This can be measured by the frequency of reopened decisions or conflicts arising from decisions.

By tracking these metrics, you can continuously refine and improve your use of the RAPID framework.

The RAPID Decision-Making Framework and Product Strategy

While RAPID is excellent for day-to-day decision-making, I’ve also found it invaluable for making strategic product decisions. Here’s how I apply RAPID to some key strategic areas:

Product Vision and Roadmap

For decisions about the overall product vision and roadmap:

• Recommend: Product Manager (me)
• Agree: Department Heads (Engineering, Design, Marketing)
• Perform: Entire Product Team
• Input: Customer Insights Team, Market Research
• Decide: CEO or Chief Product Officer

Market Expansion

When considering expansion into new markets:

• Recommend: Product Manager and Market Research Team
• Agree: Sales and Marketing Heads
• Perform: Go-to-Market Team
• Input: Legal Team, Localization Experts
• Decide: C-Suite

Technology Stack Decisions

For major technology stack decisions:

• Recommend: Chief Technology Officer or Tech Lead
• Agree: Product Manager, Security Team
• Perform: Development Team
• Input: Operations Team, External Consultants if needed
• Decide: CTO and CPO jointly

By applying RAPID to these strategic decisions, we ensure that all perspectives are considered and that we have clear accountability for the outcomes.

Training Your Team on the RAPID Decision-Making Framework

Implementing RAPID successfully requires buy-in and understanding from your entire team. Here’s the approach I’ve used to train my teams on RAPID:

1. Introduction Workshop: I start with a workshop introducing the RAPID framework, explaining each role and its importance.
2. Role-Playing Exercises: We practice applying RAPID to hypothetical scenarios, with team members rotating through different roles.
3. Real-World Application: We then apply RAPID to a real, but low-stakes decision. This allows the team to experience the framework in action without too much pressure.
4. Feedback and Refinement: After each application of RAPID, we discuss what worked well and what could be improved.
5. Documentation: We create easily accessible documentation about RAPID, including role descriptions and decision-making templates.
6. Ongoing Support: I make myself available to answer questions and provide guidance as the team becomes more comfortable with RAPID.

Remember, changing decision-making processes can be challenging. Patience and consistent reinforcement are key to successfully embedding RAPID in your team’s workflow.

The RAPID Decision-Making Framework and Remote Teams

In today’s increasingly remote work environment, implementing RAPID can pose some unique challenges. Here are some strategies I’ve used to make RAPID work effectively with distributed teams:

1. Clear Documentation: I ensure that RAPID roles and processes are clearly documented and easily accessible to all team members, regardless of their location.
2. Digital Tools: We use digital tools like JIRA or Trello to track RAPID roles and decision status for each project or feature.
3. Virtual Meetings: For important decisions, we hold virtual meetings with all RAPID role-players to ensure everyone’s voice is heard.
4. Asynchronous Communication: We use asynchronous communication tools to gather input and share recommendations, allowing team members in different time zones to contribute effectively.
5. Regular Check-ins: I schedule regular check-ins to ensure the RAPID process is working smoothly across our distributed team.

By adapting RAPID for remote work, we’ve been able to maintain efficient decision-making processes even with team members spread across different locations and time zones.

Conclusion: RAPID Decision-Making Framework

As product managers, we’re often at the center of complex decision-making processes. The RAPID framework has been a game-changer in my career, allowing me to navigate these decisions with clarity, efficiency, and inclusivity.

RAPID isn’t just about making decisions faster – it’s about making better decisions. By clearly defining roles and responsibilities, it ensures that we leverage the collective wisdom of our teams while maintaining clear accountability.

Implementing RAPID requires effort and patience. It may feel unnatural at first, and you might encounter resistance to change. But in my experience, the benefits far outweigh the initial challenges. With RAPID, I’ve seen teams become more aligned, decisions become more transparent, and products succeed as a result of clearer, more efficient decision-making processes.

---

If you enjoyed this post on RAPID Decision-Making Framework, you may also like:

• Competitor Surveillance: Staying Ahead in the Product Game
• Leveraging Behavioral Science and Gamification for Product Success
• The Importance of a Growth Mindset in Product Management