Porter’s Five Forces is an essential framework for any product manager to understand when analyzing the competitive landscape facing their industry or company. Developed by Harvard professor Michael Porter, it identifies and examines five key forces that shape the long-term profitability of any industry – competition from new entrants, bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat of substitute products and services, and rivalry among existing firms. Using Porter’s model, product managers can assess the underlying drivers of competition as well as identify areas of strength, weakness, opportunity, or threats for their business. This then allows them to craft appropriate strategies and make better strategic decisions to improve their competitive positioning.
Porter’s Five Forces
In this blog post, we’ll do a deep dive into each of Porter’s Five Forces, outlining what factors impact each one, how they directly influence competition and profitability, as well as key strategies product managers can employ to respond based on their competitive environment.
The Threat of New Entrants
The threat of new entrants refers to the threat that new competitors pose when entering an existing industry or market. For any product manager, new competitors can disrupt and reshape a market, undercutting prices, chipping away at market share, and limiting profitability. The level or scale of threats that new entrants pose depends on the barriers to entry and barriers to imitation that exist. High barriers make it extremely difficult for new firms to gain a foothold. Conversely, in industries with low barriers, new players face few restrictions, heightening overall competition. Several key barriers commonly act as barriers to entry:
Economies of Scale: Industries that require high volumes to drive down costs possess inherent barriers for new smaller-scale rivals that can’t compete on price. Established firms simply have cost advantages from their scale and experience. For a product manager, positioning around scale helps guard against new threats.
High Capital Costs: Industries that require large upfront investments, such as manufacturing facilities, R&D, marketing, etc inherently deter newcomers that lack deep pockets. Incumbents using their existing infrastructure enjoy a major cost advantage.
Switching Costs and Brand Loyalty: When customers face high switching costs or tend to be very loyal to existing brands and products, it makes stealing market share tougher for new firms. Product managers need to focus on building habits and loyalty.
Government Regulation and Policies: In many industries like financial services, transportation, and telecom, government policies protect incumbents and restrict new entrants. Navigating heavy regulation alone serves as a barrier. Compliance is a key barrier here.
IP Protection: Patents, trade secrets, and proprietary technology make imitation tougher for new rivals. Product managers should defend IP assets vigorously.
Facing down threats from industry newcomers requires strategies to heighten barriers. Product managers may leverage scale advantages, differentiate through branding/marketing, and aggressively defend any hard-won proprietary assets. Controlling shelf space or sales channels may also help block new rivals. Making progress against new threats helps sustain pricing power too.
Subscribe to Beyond the Backlog for Free!
…and get all new posts direct to you inbox:
The Bargaining Power of Suppliers
A supplier’s bargaining power refers to their ability to influence or control the terms and conditions of supplying needed inputs to the industry – things like raw materials, labor, services, etc. Powerful suppliers can pressure industry firms by raising prices, limiting quality, or shifting terms in their favor. The level of supplier power is determined by several key factors:
Supplier Concentration: Industries where there are fewer dominant suppliers have outsized influence over buyers. They may exert more pressure or control. Fragmented supplier environments however limit individual power.
Uniqueness: Suppliers offering unique products/services with few direct substitutes gain significant leverage and bargaining power over industry buyers.
Switching Costs: When the costs to switch suppliers are high for industry firms, existing suppliers wield greater power. Their bargaining positions improve if buyers are “locked in”.
Threat of Forward Integration: A credible threat of suppliers integrating vertically and directly competing with industry buyers themselves will likely lead to more accommodative terms & conditions for suppliers. No firm wants their suppliers as new competitors.
Suppliers that have built significant bargaining power are generally able to capture more value for themselves via higher prices, more favorable payment terms, restrictive contracts, etc. This can negatively impact industry profits. There are however certain strategic moves product managers can make to counteract supplier dominance:
- Building close relationships with key suppliers, and having a deep understanding of their underlying cost drivers and pain points. This allows for creating mutually beneficial solutions and limiting surprises or adversarial negotiating.
- Avoid dependence on a single supplier and ensure there are multiple supply options readily available. This enhances flexibility and weakens individual supplier leverage.
- Pursuing vertical integration such that the firm can begin producing some required inputs itself rather than purchasing from external suppliers. This reduces reliance on suppliers and their bargaining power.
The Bargaining Power of Buyers
On the other side of transactions, the bargaining power of buyers refers to the influence and control customers (downstream channels, end-users, etc) can impose over an industry’s firms in dictating terms, conditions, and prices. Powerful buyers capture more value by driving down prices, demanding better quality or advanced features and generally shifting terms & conditions to their favor. As with suppliers, buyer power is driven by certain dynamics:
Buyer Size: Large buyers have greater negotiating leverage relative to smaller suppliers. Their substantial business is key to supplier firm performance.
Switching Costs: Buyers face fewer barriers in switching between competing supplier options limiting individual firms’ bargaining power over them. Low switching costs expand buyer power.
Availability of Substitutes: The existence of alternative products/services that can readily substitute or replace current offerings again limits any individual firm’s dominance over buyers – they can easily shift to competitors.
Price Sensitivity: Buyers that place greater emphasis on pricing in purchase decisions or are otherwise highly price sensitive yield significant power to dictate pricing terms or force concessions.
Threat of Backward Integration: Buyers that could credibly integrate backwards and produce products/services themselves severely weaken supplier negotiating positions and control.
High buyer bargaining power allows customers to capture greater value for themselves while putting pressure on industry profitability. Strategies product managers can employ to lower buyer power include:
- Differentiating products from competitors to reduce direct substitution and increase customer switching costs
- Creating loyalty programs and building habit-forming product experiences that connect customers more strongly to individual brands
- Offering larger/key buyers preferential pricing, discounts or purchase terms to incentive continued business
- Improving product uniqueness so buyers have fewer equivalent alternative options
- Exploring forward integration such that the firm gets closer to and builds direct relationships with end users ahead of downstream intermediaries or channels
Executing on these dimensions can help product managers reshape the competitive landscape with customers and unlock additional growth.
The Threat of Substitute Products
Besides competition from direct rivals, companies face the threat from substitute products and services. Substitutes provide similar functionality or solutions to users and customers by employing alternate means. For a video conferencing platform, for example, in-person meetings or phone calls are potential substitute options that limit expanded usage. The threat comes from customers switching some or all spend towards these replacement offerings. Key drivers of substitute threats include:
Number of viable alternatives: Categories and markets with multiple substitute options pose larger threats as customers have more choices making switching easier.
Relative price differential: Substitutes that have a clear and meaningful price advantage attract buyer attention quickly away from potentially higher-cost primary offerings.
Switching costs: High costs or hassles involved in migrating from current products to substitutes protect against their adoption. Low switching costs facilitate substitution.
Trending improvements: Substitutes improving rapidly in either costs, features, or overall performance become more appealing options relative to existing offerings. Continued enhancement heightens threats.
Dealing with the real risk of product or service substitution requires product managers to stress value, and differentiation and build in sticky lock-in elements. Key strategic responses include:
- Promoting benefits and superior value over available substitutes through marketing and positioning.
- Lowering pricing through internal cost management efforts to better compete with substitute price points.
- Innovating rapidly to keep performance and capabilities ahead of whatever improvements substitute options are embedding.
- Increase switching costs and lock-in effects that make dropping current solutions for alternatives less appealing. These should give customers pause.
Rivalry Among Existing Competitors
The core of Porter’s model, rivalry refers to the constant jostling between firms already competing within an industry fighting for market share and profits. Unlike other elements, competitive rivalry focuses directly on peers targeting the same customers. Intense rivalry places significant downward pressure on prices along with heavy investment demands required just to keep pace. Key drivers include:
Market Concentration: Industries with fewer larger players rather than lots of smaller fragmented firms tend to foster greater head-to-head competition and aggressive skirmishes to attack share.
Industry Growth Rates: Within slow growth categories, competition for any gains available becomes cutthroat between rivals all fighting for their survival. Fast growth dampens competitive pressures.
Product Differentiation: Commoditized industries with lots of undifferentiated, identical product offerings ignite rivalry as price becomes the primary way to secure customers with few other choices to sway decisions.
Brand Identity: Strong branding allowing for customer bonding reduces individual product differentiation pressures, directing rivalry more towards marketing rather than product features.
High rivalry prevents firms from establishing significant competitive advantages or market control. Maintaining profitability requires product managers to consider ways to shift focus towards differentiation and lowering costs rather than direct head-to-head comparisons. Pursuing strategies like:
- Developing and emphasizing areas of unique differentiation amongst offerings to stand apart from peers
- Protect any proprietary and patented assets from imitation lifting barriers for duplicates
- Using established brand equity as a buffer against needing to respond to competitor tactics
- Signaling commitment to retaliate against aggressive actions to deter fierce sparring
- Exploring diversification into new segments or markets with possibly better dynamics beyond just your core category
Can help product managers reshape the competitive landscape into one more favorable for securing leadership and profits.
Porter’s Five Forces: Conclusion
Porter’s Five Forces remains an indispensable tool for product managers as they analyze their competitive landscape and make key strategic decisions. Having a deep understanding across all five areas – threats from new entrants and substitutes, plus the bargaining power held both suppliers and buyers, and finally rivalry amongst existing competitors – provides critical insights. As we have covered, each force is influenced by several industry-specific structural factors that when combined sets the overall competitiveness and long-term profit outlook.
Product managers must fully grasp the underlying drivers unique to their categories across each force to ascertain areas of strength or weaknesses. This then guides work on improving positioning and formulating strategy. Boosting barriers to entry or substitution, lowering supplier power or buyer power, and differentiating offerings to select rivals all require tailored approaches based on each company’s existing leverage points and weaknesses. Continually evaluating competitive dynamics through the Porter’s framework lens allows product managers to play both offense and defense. Building sustainable competitive advantage and delivering growth depends on how well product managers understand competition and wield the weapons Porter’s Five Forces hands them.
With that complete outline and set of section content covering Porter’s seminal model, the remainder of this long-form blog article can be filled out by the author themselves as needed. The goal was to establish the full framing, key dimensions and depth across each component force. This can now serve as the core foundation for an impactful industry-focused competitive strategy guide for product managers and other business leaders.